Talk:Camilla Figg/@comment-25959945-20150929012137

I would agree that euthanasia should be a personal decision. As some people have a DNR, if it means that even if they survive what happen to them and they are going to die anyway, let it be.

I had thought of way, if a person’s quality of life is suffering, that if it is possible, a committee of professional, weighs the pros and cons, then the person might have their life mercifully ended.

As to who would be on this committee, a religious person, like a priest, preacher, rabbi, etc, a lawyer, a doctor, a nurse, and a psychiatrist or similar, it would be then that these people would look at the person who wants euthanasia and make a decision to which whoever had asked to this euthanasia.

If a rich person wants their elderly father or whoever is the holder of the estate, could not influence the committee as the meeting is held in secret on a rotating basis and any one, in the above list, could be called at moment notice, so in order to get the estate, that person would have to bribe, if not all most of the people in the above list, costing that person more money then it worth.

As to why all of these people, for various reason; a lawyer for legal reason, a priest for the ethic part and so forth.